Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
NRIPage | Articles | U.S.-China Trade War Intensifies as Beijing Hikes Tariffs on American Goods | Get Indian Desi Latest Sports News & Updates in USA. Stay Ahead in Sports & Gaming Action - NRI Page
In a major escalation of the ongoing trade conflict between the United States and China, Beijing has announced a significant hike in tariffs on American goods, raising import duties from 84% to 125%. The move, confirmed by the Chinese finance ministry on Friday, is a direct response to recent tariff increases imposed by the U.S. administration. It marks one of the most severe retaliatory actions taken by China in the prolonged dispute that has gripped global markets and reshaped international supply chains.
China's latest tariff increase underscores the deteriorating economic relations between the world’s two largest economies. In a strongly worded statement, the Chinese finance ministry warned that further U.S. tariff escalations would be economically irrational and damaging, emphasizing that continued pressure from Washington would be ignored going forward. The ministry also asserted that current tariff levels have effectively closed the Chinese market to American imports, eliminating any remaining incentive for trade under the existing conditions.
The escalation follows President Donald Trump’s executive order that raised U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports to 125%, on top of an earlier 20% tariff imposed on goods linked to fentanyl-related manufacturing. This brings the effective total tariff rate on some Chinese goods up to 145%, according to U.S. trade officials. The Trump administration has signaled a firm stance, with no immediate plans to roll back measures despite mounting concerns over the broader economic consequences.
Market analysts have cautioned that this level of tariff retaliation could inflict lasting damage on both economies. Zhiwei Zhang, a leading economist, noted that the current phase marks the end of tariff escalation, as both nations recognize the diminishing returns and growing economic fallout. He suggested that the focus should now shift to assessing the real economic toll and the lack of any forthcoming diplomatic negotiations.
Notably, unlike previous retaliatory actions, China has not announced additional export controls or further expansion of its so-called unreliable entity list, which targets foreign companies operating in the country with restrictive measures. This restraint suggests that Beijing is carefully managing its strategic response, potentially leaving the door open for future talks.
Despite the heightened rhetoric and punitive measures, China’s commerce ministry reiterated that Beijing remains open to negotiating with the U.S., but only on equal terms. The ministry emphasized that it would continue to respond resolutely if American actions are perceived as infringing on Chinese economic interests.
The outlook for a resolution, however, remains bleak. Optimism for a bilateral deal has waned significantly as tit-for-tat duties continue to disrupt business environments and limit cross-border investments. This week alone, China has issued a series of new trade restrictions affecting American businesses, further complicating the path to a potential breakthrough.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent weighed in on the developments, expressing disappointment in China’s unwillingness to engage in meaningful negotiations. He described China as one of the most unbalanced economies in modern history and argued that the trade war would ultimately harm China more than the U.S. These statements come amid increasing concern among economists that prolonged tensions could weaken global growth and disrupt financial markets.
In reaction to the growing uncertainty, Goldman Sachs recently revised its forecast for China’s GDP growth, cutting it to 4%. The investment firm attributed the revision to the growing drag from U.S.-China trade frictions and weaker global demand. While exports to the U.S. only represent a small portion of China’s GDP, analysts warned that the fallout could significantly impact employment, with up to 20 million Chinese workers involved in sectors directly tied to U.S.-bound exports.
China has reiterated its commitment to defend its economic interests. In a meeting with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez on Friday, Chinese President Xi Jinping stated that there are no winners in a tariff war and warned that countries acting unilaterally would only isolate themselves on the global stage. The two leaders pledged to strengthen cooperation in trade, investment, and innovation, signaling China’s interest in expanding international partnerships beyond the U.S.
While the White House has yet to issue a formal response to China’s latest move, the escalation signals a deepening rift that shows no signs of easing. As businesses and consumers brace for the ripple effects, the international community watches closely, hoping for a return to dialogue before further economic damage becomes irreversible.