Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
NRIPage | Articles | Kunal Kamra Seeks Bail in Madras HC After FIR in Mumbai Over 'Traitor' Remark Against Shinde | Get Travel & Vacation guide. Plan Your Perfect Travel & Vacation Adventures - NRI Page
Chennai — Stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra has approached the Madras High Court seeking interim protection from arrest in connection with an FIR lodged against him in Mumbai. The case stems from a recent stand-up performance during which Kamra allegedly referred to Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde as a "traitor"—a remark that has sparked political and legal uproar. Kamra, who claims to be a resident of Tamil Nadu’s Villupuram, filed a petition for transit anticipatory bail in the Madras High Court. This type of bail provides protection from arrest while the petitioner makes arrangements to seek regular anticipatory bail in the jurisdiction where the FIR was filed. The application was mentioned for urgent hearing before the Chief Justice’s bench, with a hearing scheduled for 2:15 PM on Friday.
The comedian’s legal counsel informed the court that Kamra fears immediate arrest if he returns to Mumbai, where the case is registered. His team also stated that he has been receiving death threats allegedly from Shiv Sena members since the controversial performance went viral. The counsel urged the court to consider Kamra's safety and allow him legal relief before he travels to Mumbai to comply with the ongoing investigation. The Mumbai Police registered a zero FIR based on a complaint from Shiv Sena legislator Muraji Patel. The complaint cited several provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Sections 353(1)(b) and 353(2) pertaining to public mischief, and Section 356(2) related to defamation. The FIR was lodged at the Khar Police Station in Mumbai following Kamra’s remarks, which were made during a live show held at the Habitat Studio in Mumbai.
Soon after the performance, Shiv Sena workers reacted aggressively, vandalizing the Habitat Studio premises where Kamra had performed. The incident led to the arrest of twelve individuals involved in the vandalism. However, all of them were released on bail shortly thereafter. Despite being served two summonses by the Khar Police, Kamra has so far not appeared in person. He reportedly requested more time, but Mumbai Police rejected his plea. The ongoing tension surrounding the case has ignited a broader debate about the limits of satire and the state of free speech in India. Kamra, known for his acerbic political commentary and critiques of the Indian government, remains unrepentant. In a public statement, he reiterated his belief in free speech, stating, "As far as I know, it is not against the law to poke fun at our leaders and the circus that is our political system." He added that he has no plans to issue an apology for exercising his right to express his views through satire.
The case against Kamra has drawn strong reactions from both political camps and the public. Supporters of free speech have condemned the FIR and threats, asserting that comedians must be allowed the space to critique leaders without fear of arrest or violence. On the other hand, Shiv Sena leaders argue that Kamra's language was inflammatory and disrespectful to an elected representative, justifying their demand for legal action. Kamra's legal team emphasized that this is not the first time the comedian has been targeted for his political opinions. He has previously faced contempt of court proceedings and travel restrictions for his outspoken content. In this case, his lawyers argue, the charges under the BNS are being misused to stifle dissent and political satire. The incident underscores the growing conflict between artistic expression and political sensitivities in India. As the debate continues, the judiciary is now tasked with deciding whether Kamra deserves protection under the law or whether his remarks warrant custodial interrogation in Mumbai. The Madras High Court’s decision on the transit anticipatory bail will likely set a precedent for how comedians and satirists are treated in cases involving public figures. For now, all eyes remain on Chennai, where the legal proceedings could have significant implications for free expression in India’s evolving socio-political landscape.