A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 6

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 7

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 8

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 9

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 10

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 11

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 284

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_set_cookie_params(): Session cookie parameters cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 291

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 306

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 316

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 317

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 318

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 319

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 377

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_set_save_handler(): Session save handler cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 110

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Session cannot be started after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 143

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

NRIPage | Articles | Donald Trump Confirms Talks with Four Groups Over TikTok Sale Amid National Security Concerns | Get Indian Desi Latest Political News & Updates in USA. Get domestic, republic government updates - NRI Page
Edit

Donald Trump Confirms Talks with Four Groups Over TikTok Sale Amid National Security Concerns

Donald Trump Confirms Talks with Four Groups Over TikTok Sale Amid National Security Concerns

The fate of TikTok in the United States has taken a new turn as US President Donald Trump confirmed that his administration is actively engaged in talks with four potential buyers over the sale of the popular video-sharing platform. The news follows heightened concerns over TikTok’s data security risks and its ties to its Chinese parent company, ByteDance. Speaking to reporters, Donald Trump stated, "We're dealing with four different groups, and a lot of people want it ... all four are good." This revelation has sparked renewed discussions about TikTok’s future in the United States. The social media platform’s uncertainty stems from a law that required ByteDance to divest from TikTok or risk a complete ban in the country. The law, aimed at addressing national security concerns, came into effect on January 19. However, after assuming office the following day, Trump signed an executive order delaying its enforcement by 75 days. This delay was introduced to allow TikTok some breathing room while ByteDance and US officials sought an alternative solution that would ensure the platform’s continued presence in the United States while addressing security concerns. Trump's executive order specifically directed the US Attorney General to pause enforcement of the TikTok ban during this period. The delay has provided TikTok with a crucial window to explore potential sales or partnerships that could satisfy US regulatory concerns.
 

Why is TikTok Facing a Potential Ban?

TikTok's legal battle in the US stems from concerns over its data privacy practices and potential links to the Chinese government. US officials have argued that ByteDance’s ownership poses a significant security threat, fearing that sensitive user data could be accessed by Beijing authorities. This concern prompted the US government to introduce legislation that required ByteDance to sell TikTok’s US operations or face a nationwide ban. The decision has triggered a wave of uncertainty for TikTok's future in America.
 

Potential Buyers in the Race

According to a Reuters report, multiple influential buyers have shown interest in acquiring TikTok’s US operations. One notable potential buyer is former Los Angeles Dodgers owner Frank McCourt, known for his involvement in major business ventures. Analysts have estimated TikTok’s value to be as high as $50 billion, underscoring the platform’s immense influence and value in the social media landscape.
 

Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund Proposal

Adding another layer to the unfolding story, Donald Trump previously signed an executive order in February, proposing the creation of a sovereign wealth fund. Trump suggested that this fund could potentially play a role in financing the acquisition of TikTok or supporting key infrastructure and economic initiatives. The executive order instructed the Treasury and Commerce Departments to submit a plan within 90 days, outlining potential funding strategies and governance structures for the proposed wealth fund. If established, this sovereign wealth fund would mark a significant shift in US economic policy. Unlike other nations that operate wealth funds to manage surplus resources, the United States, which often runs at a fiscal deficit, may face challenges in establishing and maintaining such a fund. Trump has previously proposed that this fund could be financed through "tariffs and other intelligent things," suggesting that creative economic measures could fuel the fund’s development.
 

What’s Next for TikTok?

With the 75-day deadline approaching, TikTok’s future in the United States hangs in the balance. The platform’s ability to continue operating will depend largely on the outcome of negotiations between ByteDance and potential buyers. If no sale agreement is reached before the deadline, TikTok could face a complete ban in the United States. Alternatively, new policies or compromises may provide TikTok with the flexibility to continue its operations under stricter regulatory guidelines. The uncertain future of TikTok has created anxiety among its massive US user base, content creators, and businesses that rely on the platform for marketing and engagement.
 

Broader Implications for Social Media and Data Privacy

TikTok’s legal battle has reignited concerns about data privacy in the digital age. With tech giants like Meta, Google, and Snapchat closely observing developments, the outcome of TikTok's negotiations could set a precedent for how foreign-owned tech companies are regulated in the United States. Furthermore, Trump's push for a sovereign wealth fund reflects an evolving strategy in US economic policy. While some experts argue that such a fund could stabilize American investments in key industries, others question its viability in a country that operates with a fiscal deficit.
 

As ByteDance navigates complex negotiations and US policymakers assess potential security risks, TikTok’s presence in the American digital ecosystem remains uncertain. The next few weeks are critical as Trump’s 75-day extension draws closer to expiration. Whether through a successful sale, policy adjustments, or further delays, the fate of TikTok will have significant implications for social media platforms, data security regulations, and international trade relations. As developments continue to unfold, TikTok users, creators, and stakeholders await clarity on whether the platform will maintain its strong foothold in the United States or face an uncertain future.

What is your response?

joyful Joyful 0%
cool Cool 0%
thrilled Thrilled 0%
upset Upset 0%
unhappy Unhappy 0%
AD
AD