Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
The ongoing Tirumala Laddu fiasco has escalated to the Supreme Court of India, sparking intense discussions. During the latest hearing, a Bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan critically examined the arguments from both sides.
Key highlights from the hearing include:
Lack of Conclusive Evidence: The court pointed out that there is no definitive proof supporting claims related to the Tirumala Laddu issue. Justices questioned th
The ongoing Tirumala Laddu fiasco has escalated to the Supreme Court of India, sparking intense discussions. During the latest hearing, a Bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan critically examined the arguments from both sides.
Key highlights from the hearing include:
Lack of Conclusive Evidence: The court pointed out that there is no definitive proof supporting claims related to the Tirumala Laddu issue. Justices questioned th
