Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
NRIPage | Articles | YS Jagan Mohan Reddy's ₹200 Crore Claim to YS Sharmila Raises Eyebrows Amid Ongoing Legal Troubles | Get Indian Desi Latest Political News & Updates in USA. Get domestic, republic government updates - NRI Page
The ongoing property disputes between YS Jagan Mohan Reddy and his sister YS Sharmila have taken another dramatic turn. In a recent statement, Jagan claimed to have provided approximately ₹200 crore to Sharmila over the past decade, emphasizing that this was done out of "sisterly love and affection."
While this assertion may initially appear to be an attempt to bolster Jagan's public image by showcasing his support for Sharmila, it has also drawn significant scrutiny. Observers and analysts suggest that this declaration could backfire, especially considering Jagan's current legal challenges with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
Jagan's claim raises questions about the source and legitimacy of the ₹200 crore, particularly as many of his companies and assets are under investigation. Legal experts warn that such a public statement regarding large financial transactions could invite further investigation from the ED, especially in light of ongoing cases related to disproportionate assets.
With the ED potentially looking into the origins of this significant sum, Jagan's statement could prove problematic. Analysts argue that this might not only cast doubt on his financial dealings but also expose him to additional legal scrutiny.
In a landscape already fraught with tension and public speculation, Jagan's recent comments could escalate the complexities of his legal situation, turning a seemingly innocuous family matter into a potential legal quagmire.
