Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
The Supreme Court of India recently denied a maintenance plea filed by a woman seeking financial support from her estranged husband. The court ruled that since both individuals were employed as Assistant Professors and earned comparable salaries, there was no valid ground for granting maintenance. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, cited Article 136 of the Constitution of India, stating that no case for interference was warranted.
The wife had approach
The Supreme Court of India recently denied a maintenance plea filed by a woman seeking financial support from her estranged husband. The court ruled that since both individuals were employed as Assistant Professors and earned comparable salaries, there was no valid ground for granting maintenance. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, cited Article 136 of the Constitution of India, stating that no case for interference was warranted.
The wife had approach
