A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 6

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 7

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 8

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 9

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 10

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_null_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_null_driver.php

Line Number: 11

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 284

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_set_cookie_params(): Session cookie parameters cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 291

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 306

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 316

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 317

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 318

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 319

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 377

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_set_save_handler(): Session save handler cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 110

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Session cannot be started after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 143

Backtrace:

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/application/controllers/Articles.php
Line: 31
Function: __construct

File: /home/ipsit/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

NRIPage | Articles | White House Crypto Summit Ends With Mixed Reactions as Bitcoin Drops | Get Finance & Economics News. Master Your Financial Future - NRI Page
Edit

White House Crypto Summit Ends With Mixed Reactions as Bitcoin Drops

White House Crypto Summit Ends With Mixed Reactions as Bitcoin Drops
The first-ever White House crypto summit left some investors disappointed as Bitcoin prices dipped. While the event marked a shift in U.S. policy toward digital assets, the lack of strong commitments led to uncertainty.

Crypto Industry Hopes for Stronger Support
The White House hosted its first-ever cryptocurrency summit, bringing together top executives from digital asset firms to discuss the administration’s stance on crypto regulation. The event was led by venture capitalist David Sacks, who was appointed as the administration’s "crypto czar" to shape digital asset policies. The summit focused on reversing the strict regulatory measures imposed under the previous administration, signaling a more crypto-friendly approach. However, many industry leaders expected stronger commitments to government-backed cryptocurrency initiatives, leading to frustration among investors.

Bitcoin Prices Drop Despite Strategic Reserve Announcement
Bitcoin prices fell roughly 3% during the summit and were set to close the week down about 7%, trading around $87,000. The decline came after the announcement of a new strategic bitcoin reserve, a measure long advocated by crypto proponents. However, the details of the reserve left investors unimpressed. The order signed by the president outlined that the reserve would consist only of bitcoin holdings previously seized by law enforcement, rather than new government purchases. Additionally, a separate digital asset stockpile would be created for seized non-bitcoin tokens, such as Ethereum and Ripple. The executive order did not establish a clear timeline or commitment for further cryptocurrency acquisitions, stating that any future purchases would be conducted in a budget-neutral manner without increasing taxpayer costs.

Despite concerns from investors, the fact that the summit took place at all reflects a major shift in government attitudes toward crypto. For years, the industry has sought mainstream acceptance, and the administration’s engagement marks a significant departure from previous policies. The crypto industry played a major role in the 2024 election cycle, contributing over $245 million to political campaigns, making it one of the largest sources of corporate donations. In return, the industry expected stronger commitments from the administration regarding regulatory policies and government involvement in digital assets. During the summit, the president reaffirmed his goal to make the U.S. "the crypto capital of the world" and a global leader in financial technology. However, some industry leaders felt that the announcements fell short of expectations.


Crypto executives voiced disappointment over the scope of the strategic bitcoin reserve. Some argued that including only Bitcoin, rather than a broader selection of cryptocurrencies, was a missed opportunity. Others criticized the lack of new crypto-friendly tax policies, as some had speculated that capital gains taxes on digital assets might be removed or reduced. One prominent crypto investor expressed frustration, saying that merely "exploring" or "studying" crypto regulations was not a true victory for the industry. He added that the announcement did not require an executive order, as the government already had the authority to hold seized crypto assets.

Digital Fort Knox: The White House’s Justification
White House officials described the establishment of the strategic bitcoin reserve as a "digital Fort Knox," designed to ensure that the U.S. maintains proper control over its digital holdings. Previously, the government had liquidated seized digital assets in a sporadic manner, sometimes missing out on potential gains as Bitcoin’s value increased. Officials also addressed online rumors suggesting that cryptocurrency profits might become tax-exempt. They clarified that no such tax policy changes were included in the executive order. Additionally, some observers misinterpreted the administration’s earlier statements, believing that three specific non-bitcoin cryptocurrencies would be foundational to the strategic reserve. White House officials emphasized that the reserve would initially hold only Bitcoin, with other digital assets placed in a separate stockpile.

Although the summit did not deliver the immediate regulatory changes some had hoped for, it marked an important step in integrating cryptocurrency into mainstream financial policy. The administration has pledged to end regulatory hostility toward digital assets, but it remains unclear how far these changes will go. As cryptocurrency continues to play a growing role in finance and politics, investors will be watching closely to see whether the administration takes additional steps to support the industry.

The White House’s first-ever crypto summit was a historic event, signaling a shift in U.S. policy toward digital assets. However, the announcements fell short of investor expectations, leading to a drop in Bitcoin prices. While the administration’s commitment to ending aggressive crypto regulations is a positive step, the lack of concrete policy changes leaves uncertainty in the market. With the U.S. positioning itself as a leader in digital finance, the next steps taken by regulators and lawmakers will determine the future of cryptocurrency adoption and innovation in the country.
 
 

What is your response?

joyful Joyful 0%
cool Cool 0%
thrilled Thrilled 0%
upset Upset 0%
unhappy Unhappy 0%
AD
AD